SHL numerical reasoning tests: format and practice
SHL numerical assessments can use interactive tasks or multiple-choice questions. Check the exact test name in your invitation before choosing practice. This guide separates Numerical Reasoning, Numerical Ability and Numerical Calculation, then uses an independent ratio problem to help you choose between practising the maths and exploring SHL's own familiarisation resources.
Reviewed
Testonome is independent. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by the organisations whose tests this page describes.
Your invitation names a test, and that name decides what is worth practising. SHL publishes a fact sheet for three numerical assessments, and they ask for different work: one has you build charts and fill in spreadsheets, another gives you multiple-choice questions, a third times you on plain calculation.
What this site helps with is the arithmetic underneath all three. Whichever one you are sent, the numbers behave the same way, and that is what our drills train: free, untimed, with the working shown for every answer. What we do not reproduce is SHL’s own screen — the chart you build, the spreadsheet you fill, the calculator that may or may not be there. For those, SHL’s own practice tests are the place, and this page says below where they are.
So this page does two things. It matches the name on your invitation to the task that name means, then gives you one ratio problem to work, because how that goes tells you which of the two jobs you actually have. If your test is already clear and you want untimed drills now, they are in our numerical section.
The test name determines which format to practise
These are the three numerical assessments SHL publishes a fact sheet for. The limits are the ones printed on those fact sheets, with the year each was published.
| Name in the invitation | Documented task and response | Published limits |
|---|---|---|
| Verify Interactive – Numerical Reasoning | Interpret numerical data by creating charts and graphs and filling in spreadsheets | 18 minutes, up to 10 questions (2018) |
| Verify – Numerical Ability | Solve numerical problems and interpret data, answering multiple choice | 20 minutes, up to 16 questions (2018) |
| Verify Interactive – Numerical Calculation | Apply order of operations, perform calculations, identify calculation errors | 10 minutes, up to 12 questions (2019) |
Read that table as published specifications carrying the dates above. What governs your sitting is the invitation you were sent and the instructions shown on screen before the test starts.
The first row and the second are the ones candidates mix up. Both are called numerical, and one of them asks you to produce a chart or a filled spreadsheet while the other asks you to pick an option. Practising multiple-choice questions does not rehearse building a chart.
If your invitation says only “SHL assessment”, do not guess the version. Check the instructions that came with it, or ask the recruiter who sent it.
Check the calculation before practising the interface
Work the question below before you read anything under it. Getting it right tells you your arithmetic is not the problem, and that your preparation time belongs on the response format instead.
Work this out
A bonus pool of 4,800 euros is shared between the early and late shifts in the ratio 5 : 3. How much does the late shift receive?
Our question, written for Testonome practice. Nothing here is recorded or scored.
Check your answer
B, 1,800 euros. Count the parts before splitting anything: 5 + 3 = 8 parts. One part is worth 4,800 ÷ 8 = 600 euros. The late shift holds three of those parts, so 600 × 3 = 1,800 euros. The late shift takes the smaller share, so a correct answer lands under half the pool, and half of 4,800 is 2,400 euros.
Each of the other three answers comes from one identifiable move.
- 3,000 euros is the early shift's share. The method was right and the ratio was read from the wrong end, so the five parts were reported instead of the three.
- 2,400 euros splits the pool equally. That answers a question with no ratio in it.
- 600 euros stops at one part. That is the first step of the working, and the question asked for three parts.
Picking B without working it out is a different result from picking B with the method. If you cannot reproduce those three steps now, treat it as a miss.
That question is ours, and the arithmetic in it is what sits underneath a data-interpretation task. It does not reproduce an SHL question and it does not reproduce SHL’s on-screen controls.
Choose the next step from what happened
| What happened | What to do next |
|---|---|
| You answered 3,000, 2,400 or 600 euros | Read the matching explanation above, then drill ratio sharing until the method is automatic. |
| You answered 1,800 with the full method | Drill it anyway, on problems you have not seen. One answer does not establish readiness. |
| The arithmetic was fine and the response controls are what you have not seen | Use SHL’s own practice tests. Our drill teaches the calculation and does not reproduce those controls. |
| Your trouble is percentage change rather than splitting a total | Start with percentage change instead. |
If the method itself needs teaching rather than repetition, our ratio-sharing page writes it out in full before the questions start.
SHL’s free practice tests are the answer to the format half. SHL says their main purpose is to make you comfortable with the way its assessments work, that they do not cover every assessment or language, and that not all of them produce a report. They teach the screen, and this page does not replace them.
That leaves the arithmetic, which is the part you can work on today. The button below opens a free untimed ratio-sharing drill: five original questions, each worked through after you submit, with no account and no payment. It also suggests a target time for the calculation. That figure is Testonome’s own pacing for this one skill. The times SHL publishes are whole-assessment limits, and the table above is where they are.